Skip to Content
Top

In The News

Experts doubt the Pentagon can punish Kelly over the 'illegal orders' video

In the article, attorney Patrick McLain — a retired Marine Corps judge and former federal prosecutor — describes the idea of the Pentagon punishing Mark Kelly over the “illegal-orders” video as “the kind of … wackadoodle thing” one sees when someone penalizes a person for “essentially exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.


WATCH: ‘I am not going to be silenced.’ Sen. Kelly denounces ‘bullying’ by Trump, Hegseth

In the PBS-NewsHour article, criminal-defense attorney Patrick McLain calls the attempt to punish Mark Kelly “the kind of … wackadoodle thing” — arguing that trying to court-martial him over a video urging troops to refuse “illegal orders” amounts to punishing him for “essentially exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.”


Experts doubt the Pentagon can punish Kelly over the 'illegal orders' video

In the article, attorney Patrick McLain — a retired Marine Corps judge and former federal prosecutor — argued the push to court-martial Mark Kelly over a video urging troops to disobey “illegal orders” was baseless, noting that it seemed more about punishing protected free speech than enforcing legitimate military law.


Doubts Raised Over Mark Kelly’s Illegal Orders Punishment

In the article, former Marine-Corps judge and ex-federal prosecutor Patrick McLain calls the effort to punish Mark Kelly over the video urging troops to refuse “illegal orders” “a wackadoodle thing,” arguing it would amount to penalizing Kelly for “essentially exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.”


Experts doubt the Pentagon can punish Kelly over the ‘illegal orders’ video

Attorney Patrick McLain — a retired Marine Corps judge and former federal prosecutor — said this case seems like a “wackadoodle thing,” arguing the effort to punish Mark Kelly for the video is unprecedented and looks like retaliation against “essentially exercising his First Amendment right to free speech.”


Experts doubt the Pentagon can punish Sen. Mark Kelly over the ‘illegal orders' video

In the article, which notes that the Mark Kelly investigation raises serious legal and constitutional doubts, retired Marine judge and former federal prosecutor Patrick McLain argues the attempt to punish Kelly — who appeared in a video urging troops to reject “illegal orders” — is “wackadoodle,” saying it amounts to penalizing him for “essentially exercising his First Amendment right to free speech."


The Ghislaine Maxwell Emails

In the article, criminal-defense attorney Patrick McLain comments that the level of access and personal attention Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly received from the prison warden at the minimum-security facility in Texas is “a rare occurrence,” likening it to “the head of a large corporation … regularly having contact with people on the assembly line.”


Ghislaine Maxwell's prison emails show she is 'happier' at minimum-security Texas facility

In the article, attorney Patrick McLain publicly commented on the retaliation of inmate Julie Howell—stating, “Nobody’s going to say anything about Ghislaine Maxwell now.” He also notes that it is “a rare occurrence” for a person with Maxwell’s background to be moved into such a minimum-security facility, suggesting that her transfer defies standard procedures.


‘This is fantastic!’ Ghislaine Maxwell gushes over special treatment in prison

In the article, criminal defense attorney Patrick McLain, who has represented women at the same Texas prison, told NBC News that the level of access and assistance Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly received from the prison warden was “a rare occurrence.” McLain compared it to “the head of a large corporation... regularly having contact with people on the assembly line,” underscoring how unusual her treatment appeared within the federal prison system.

Suspects in Texas ICE shooting tied to trans, anti-fascist activism

Attorney Patrick J. McLain, who defended one of the defendants in the Alvarado case, emphasized his client’s lack of intent to carry out terrorism and highlighted the attorney’s own 20-year military background when stating, “I’m offended [by the terrorism charges] as a guy who participated in the War on Terror. They weren’t out there to hurt anybody, with the exception of whoever was shooting at people.”


US prosecutors bring first antifa terrorism charges in Texas police shooting case

In the Reuters article, attorney Patrick McLain, representing defendant Zachary Evetts, emphasized his client’s innocence, stating, “I have seen no evidence from the prosecutors to support any of the charges,” and criticized the new terrorism counts as politically driven.


2 arrested in Texas immigration detention center shooting now face terrorism-related charges

In the article, defense attorney Patrick McLain, representing one of the defendants, stated he has seen “zero basis” for the charges against his client.


'Antifa-aligned' men face terrorism charges in July ICE attack, FBI director says

In the landmark federal terrorism indictment stemming from a July 4 attack on a Texas immigration facility, Patrick McLain — representing defendant Zachary Evetts — argued that “nowhere in the communications … do we see anyone agree to doing something that is either a display of violence or actual violence,” and asserted he’s “seen zero basis” for the terrorism charges.


First federal indictments made in connection with Alvarado ICE detention center shooting

McLain, representing defendant Zachary Evetts, argued that his client “was exercising his First Amendment rights while protesting … and there’s no evidence he fired shots.” He further criticized what he called “political pressures … on U.S. attorneys… to pursue charges that… would not see the light of a courtroom because more prudent and balanced leaders … would prevent those things from happening.”


DOJ brings first Antifa-related terrorism charges in Texas ICE attack

In the article by Fox News, attorney Patrick McLain—representing defendant Zachary Evetts in the federal terrorism indictment, stated that “Nobody was planning terrorism. This was an assembly of people protesting … and nobody was intending to harm anybody. I have not seen any evidence to support any of the charges.”


2 arrested in Texas immigration detention center shooting now face terrorism-related charges

In the federal indictment stemming from the July 4 shooting at the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, Patrick McLain—representing defendant Zachary Evetts—stated that he has “seen zero basis” for the terrorism-related charges brought against his client.


Two defendants in ICE Prairieland facility attack in Alvarado now charged

This NBC 5 segment covers two of the defendants involved in the July 4 attack at the ICE Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, who are now charged with supplying materials to Antifa supporters to carry out the incident. Patrick McLain is representing one of the defendants in this case.


Dragnet': Ex-DOJ lawyer sounds FBI alarm as Bondi and Patel hail new 'antifa' indictment

In the article, McLain—representing defendant Zachary Evetts—stated that he “has seen no evidence from the prosecutors to support any of the charges.” He further implied the case is politically motivated and expressed concern about how the indictment could impact civil liberties and the standard required to bring terrorism charges.


Antifa loons hit with first terror charges for ICE attack part of cell armed with 50 guns: feds

In this article, McLain, representing defendant Zachary Evetts, asserted that “nowhere in the communications … do we see anybody agreeing to do something that is either a display of violence or actual violence,” and said he has “seen zero basis” for the terrorism‑related charges so far.